|
An Interview with Pat Broderick, Perennial Teacher and Lifelong
Learner
Patricia Broderick is co-founder and Vice President/Editorial
Director of Teaching K-8 magazine, a 35-year-old classroom service
magazine for the elementary school teacher. Her 51 working years
have been spent in teaching or working for teachers. She has organized
and conducted workshops for teachers at locations throughout the
United States, and has taught children and non-English speaking
adult immigrants to read on a volunteer basis. For over 12 years
Pat has also served on the advisory board of the Basic School Network,
founded by the late Dr. Ernest R. Boyer.
Pat has presented at several writing workshops at colleges, school
districts and educational organizations and, for the last 20 years,
has been on the faculty of the annual Highlights Foundation Writer's
Workshop.
In a recent email interview, Pat shared her thoughts on the current
and future state of the teaching profession, the evolving field
of professional development, and what she sees as critical to classroom
success.
Q: You've been involved in education for all your working
years. What drew you into the field and what has helped you to
stick with it?
A: I am the granddaughter and daughter of Irish immigrants, and
education was fed to me with every spoon of baby food I ingested.
Education was an immigrant's Holy Grail. Once I was bitten by the
joy of learning - and that happened at home where I learned to
read and "do sums" before I went to first grade (they
didn't have kindergarten in those days) - I wanted to share it
with everyone. I'd probably be the perpetual student, given half
a chance.
That's most likely what made me stick with the field of education. I learn
every single day from the teachers we visit, from the master teachers with
whom I've become friendly through the years, from teacher's manuscripts, from
our columnists. Continual learning makes for a very exciting and rich life.
Q: According to the latest issue of Teaching PreK-8, your staff has visited
over 139 schools in 43 states. You've also personally organized and conducted
countless teacher workshops as well as writing workshops. Tell me about your
hands-on philosophy.
A: I feel very strongly that the real world is very hands-on,
and learning should prepare us for that world. [Learning], too,
must be engaging. I believe in the whole-child philosophy, and
there's no way one can believe in that type of education for a
child without it being very hands-on. It's the only way it can
be done.
I think this hands-on philosophy is important to Teaching
K-8 magazine, as it was the philosophy with which we launched
the magazine. It is still as valid 35 years later. It's why
teachers subscribe. Best Practices of 2006 are still calling
for a whole-child approach, which, of course, means being hands-on.
Also, a magazine format is the ideal way to translate whole-child
philosophy into the daily language of the classroom. I can take
any single aspect of the best practices within the whole child
philosophy and handle it in an exciting way that increases the
teacher's professional development while providing good learning
strategies in the classroom.
Q: Teaching PreK-8 is "The Magazine for Professional
Development." What are some of the major changes you've
seen in the area of professional development in the past decade,
and what changes do you foresee in the future? Does the term
still hold the same meaning it did ten years ago?
A: The changes I've seen in P.D. in the last ten years have been
huge. No longer is a day or two each year of in-service on math
activities - or a "new" textbook
approach to teaching reading - sufficient for Professional Development. Teachers
are now reaching to be Board Certified by the National Board for Professional
Teaching Standards. They are examining their own practices in the light of
accepted best practices. They are joining book groups before and after school
to discuss professional development handbooks by Regie Routman and Shelley
Harwayne. Teachers today understand that they ARE professionals and must
shoulder the responsibilities that go along with being professional. They
share their knowledge via teachers' magazines. These are not the arts and
crafts activities of years ago, but in-depth recounting of a best practice
they've tried and adapted with success in their specific classrooms.
Q: At the AEP Summit in June, Mary Ann Wolf of the State Education
Technology Directors Association talked about the challenges
of providing professional development to today's busy teachers.
What is causing these time constraints and what can publishers
do to meet this challenge? What types of products exist that
do a good job of addressing this problem?
If you're thinking only of P.D. by way of technology, this requires
a huge array of skills that are not necessarily in any teacher's
bag of tricks. To find time to learn the new products in this ever-changing
market is almost impossible.
I also think teachers are stretched to the max with teaching to
the test and still trying to educate the whole child. With all
the good will in the world, there are only 24 hours in the day
and their schedule would require at least 36 hours. Now, after
I've blasted technology, I must say that the flexibility of tutorials
online that teachers can try, or work with, in the wee hours of
the morning do provide those magic hours missing for P.D. during
the day.
Q: Also at the AEP Summit, Nikki Barnes of the NEA talked
about a need for professional development products that help
teachers assess their own progress as well as the progress of
their students. Are there products out there that address this
need? Is there enough demand in this area to constitute a market
opportunity for publishers?
I think there are many products on the market that already help
teachers assess their own professional development progress. But
they're not sold singly: The information is included within handbooks
and in various student assessment packages. I think the online
and interactive online courses (and there are soooo many now) do
a good job of helping teachers assess themselves.
Q: As the baby-boomers retire, the demographics of the teaching profession
are changing. Having spent so much time "in the trenches" with teachers,
so to speak, what is your vision of the next generation of teachers?
To thrive in the classroom, I think teachers in the future will
have a broader view of education. They'll be very concerned that
they are training citizens of the world. Although brands
are always important as a starting point, I feel the more professional
teacher will tend to look at each item independently, not just
accept it because it came from a familiar publishing house. It's
just like trade book authors, as I think about it. Just because they've had
several best sellers doesn't mean that their next book will be a winner.
Teachers will be very selective and use many more teaching aids in the classroom.
I think teachers will be looking for products that span the curriculum; something
easily adaptable to their particular way of teaching. I don't think they'll
want something that provides only one strategy or technique.
Q: According to a 2005 Issue Brief from the Alliance for Excellent
Education, nearly half of all teachers that enter the field leave
within five years. Why this is the case? What, if anything, can
publishers do to help retain these young teachers?
This is a real hot potato. I think teachers need mentors from
day one... and they don't usually get them. Sometimes, if they
do get one, it's someone who is really not mentoring willingly
and it's apparent in his or her attitude. The teaching profession
is not alone in this. I've had so many people tell one or two of
our employees how lucky they were to be mentored, as one doesn't
see it very often anymore. Of course, this lack of mentoring creates a worse
situation in education. Young, altruistic teachers really want to change
the world, or at least the world within their classrooms. Imagine, they're
impacting anywhere from 18 to 24 lives, plus the families of those children.
It's a lot of responsibility when one doesn't have the experience, and they're
so alone.
I don't think this is the only reason they leave, but I think the reality of
the classroom - as opposed to being a student teacher - presents a huge gap
teachers are expected to leap. Robert Fulghum had it right: "Hold hands,
everything is better with two."
I think teacher preparation needs updating, as well. We're still preparing
teachers as we did in 1910 for 21st century kids.
Q: What are your thoughts on the teacher quality mandate
of NCLB? Is teacher quality something that can be quantified
in a test or decreed by a teacher college in the form of a degree
or can it only come from teaching experience and working with
teacher mentors?
There are many good things that can't be measured. How good is
a good apple pie? Now, that's simplistic, I know, but teacher quality
can be just as subjectively assessed - and not mean a thing. I
think teachers colleges can structure many programs that theoretically
can produce teachers with great knowledge of how to teach. Is that
a guarantee that each of these teachers will be spectacular? I
don't think so. And shouldn't we be shooting for spectacular rather
than a general yardstick determined by committee?
I feel teacher quality comes from good preparation, an unwavering desire to
be in the classroom rather than anywhere else, constantly honing one's skills
- and experience. For some teachers, two years experience may ignite all kinds
of skills. For another teacher, it may take a bit longer. What we want to be
sure to weed out are the teachers with one-year experience repeated 25 times.
I spent a weekend workshop this summer with a young (five years experience)
teacher from Cave Spring, Georgia, and she blew me away with her professionalism.
She wanted to be nowhere but in her second grade classroom. That fire in the
belly is critical and is the common denominator in the very best teachers.
Questions, ideas, or
in need of more information? Please contact Stacey
Pusey at 302-295-8349. |