|
Accountability Key to School Equity and Closing Achievement Gaps
This article is the third in a series recapping the themes
and issues most relevant to the future of the educational publishing
industry, as told by the slate of expert speakers at AEP's June
Educational Publishing Summit. This installment presents perspectives
on the education market from the state and local levels.
In terms of NCLB accountability, educators and administrators
agree that tracking student progress is an important step toward
creating school equity and closing achievement gaps, but there
are challenges and unintended consequences of NCLB that need to
be addressed.
This was the consensus among panelists last month at the Focus
Forward Town Hall Meeting, held on the second day of AEP's 2006
Educational Publishing Summit. The theme of the meeting was "Know
Your Customer," and speakers presented attendees with perspectives
from the state, district, and local levels.
The panel was moderated by Mark Stevens, Kids Online Education
Director and General Manager at AOL@SCHOOL, and included Nikki
Barnes of the National Education Association; John English, Assistant
Superintendent of Fairfax County Public Schools; and Mary Ann Wolf,
Executive Director of the State Educational Technology Directors
Association.
According to English, one of the most problematic issues in Fairfax
County is school choice, the NCLB provision that gives students
in failing schools the option to attend another school that has
made adequate yearly progress.
"If a school goes to choice, it means Fairfax County has
to provide busing for kids to leave that school and go to a nearby
school. Guess who gets on the bus and goes to the other schools
- it's not the kids who didn't pass the test...So we end up spending
a lot of money busing kids that are making 'pass/advance' on our
state tests," said English.
To this end, Fairfax County has appealed to the Departments of
Education at both the state and national levels to make supplemental
education services the first step in failing schools.
Mary Ann Wolf agreed that NCLB implementation has presented some
challenges, but feels important progress has been made as a result
of the law.
"While some of the details of the law have proven very difficult,
I think the motivation [NCLB] has provided and the discussions
it has started have led to some very positive changes in schools," she
said.
Wolf pointed to the development and implementation of benchmarking
products as a step toward more effective instruction. Immediate
feedback allows teachers to make adjustments and remediate instantly,
which leads to more individualized instruction, she said.
Nikki Barnes, providing input from the educators' perspective,
also expressed support for NCLB accountability, noting that the
best way for a teacher to measure his or her effectiveness is to
measure student achievement. In addition, she appealed to publishers
to create professional development materials that help teachers
assess their own lessons and progress in addition to the progress
of their students.
"We know that a teacher who analyzes his or her practice
is a better teacher," said Barnes, "but I don't see components
that promote teacher reflection in the resources that [publishers]
are producing right now."
According to the panelists, other products that are in demand
include formative assessments; benchmark testing; and programs
that help track, organize, and assess student data.
Questions, ideas, or
in need of more information? Please contact Stacey
Pusey at 302-295-8349.
|