|
Fifth Anniversary of NCLB Not A Celebration to Some
Five years have passed since the landmark No Child Left Behind
version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act was passed.
This year also marks the date for reauthorizing the law, which
is catalyzing widespread debate about the future of the bill. Critics
and supporters agree that the central principle of the law - ensuring
that all students regardless of race, disability or class should
be proficient in math and reading when they graduate from high
school - is sound. Now, both critics and supporters are trying
to determine what in the law needs to be changed and if student
achievement can really be improved under the NCLB mandates.
Mike Petrilli, Vice President of Programs and Policy at education
think tank the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation and an NCLB supporter,
recently stated, "I've gradually and reluctantly come to the
conclusion that NCLB as enacted is fundamentally flawed and probably
beyond repair." In his weekly bulletin, the Education
Gadfly, Petrilli goes on to explain that there are both structural
and enforcement flaws in the bill that will take more than tweaking
to fix. Instead, he supports weighted student funding to address
funding inequities and national standards to come up with an accurate
accounting of achievement. He also believes we can do away with
mandates on teacher quality, sanctions and guaranteed school choice.
Monty Neill, chairman of the Forum on Education Accountability
(FEA), echoes these sentiments: "The goal of NCLB is reasonable
- the structure and way it's been implemented have been a disaster." However,
unlike Petrilli, Neill maintains the law can be effective, albeit
with the following significant changes.
-Replacing standardized tests with the use of multiple achievement
measures
-Authorizing the use interventions that result in improved student
achievement instead of sanctions
-Enhancing the knowledge and skills teachers, administrators, and families
need to support high student achievement
-Increasing NCLB funding to cover a substantial percentage of
the costs that states and districts will incur
In comments reported in the Washington Post, Secretary
Spellings said she believes the law is fundamentally sound and
is rejecting calls that would overhaul the legislation, instead
favoring the "perfect
and tweak" approach. As a measure of success, USED points
to results from the recent NAEP test, which reflect a larger increase
in proficiency between 1999 and 2004 than the previous 28 years
combined. At the same time the total number of students who are
proficient is low. Only 41 percent of white fourth graders are
proficient in reading and only 13 percent of black fourth graders
are proficient in mathematics. The results of the 2004 NAEP were
released last July.
Questions, ideas, or
in need of more information? Please contact Stacey
Pusey at 856-241-7772.
|