The Association of Educational Publishers
HomeCall to ActionNo Child Left BehindLegislative Quick HitsNIMASGovernment ResourcesArchivesLinksAEP Home

Government Relations

 

Find Your Congressman & Senators

View the current Government Relations Committee Members


House Releases Draft Education Bills [more]

FY2012 Funding Omnibus Includes Previously Endangered Ed. Programs [more]

Evolving Policies in Texas Reflect "New Normal" [more]

Texas School Districts Suing Over Lack of Funding [more]

Senate ESEA Bill Receives Pushback from Education Organizations [more]

Last updated on 1/17/12

News to Use Now

House Releases Draft Education Bills

January 16, 2011—On January 6 the Republicans from the House Education and the Workforce Committee released two draft education bills meant to overhaul the current ESEA. Unlike the Senate ESEA bill, the House legislation is not bipartisan. It focuses on limiting the power of the Department of Education and the Secretary of Education, opening up flexibility in federal funding, and removing federal intervention for low-performing schools.

Student Success Act highlights

  • Returning responsibility for student achievement to states, school districts, and parents, while maintaining high expectations
  • Providing states and school districts greater flexibility to meet students’ unique needs
  • Investing limited taxpayer dollars wisely
  • Strengthening programs for schools and targeted populations
  • Maintaining and strengthening long-standing protections for state and local autonomy

Encouraging Innovation and Effective Teachers Act highlights

  • Providing information to parents on teacher effectiveness.
  • Increasing school choice and engaging parents in their child's education
  • Increasing state and local innovation to reform public education
  • Eliminating unnecessary and ineffective federal programs
  • Supporting Impact Aid

In a statement, House Committee on Education and the Workforce Chairman John Kline (R-MN) said, "There is a strong sense of urgency that the heavy-handed law must be reformed to ensure more children have access to the quality education they deserve. Today, I'm pleased to release draft legislation that will change the status quo and put more control into the hands of the teachers, principals, superintendents, and parents who know the needs of children best. This is not final legislation. It is a step forward in the ongoing debate on the best way to improve education in America."

Emphasizing the lack of bipartisan input on the draft, House Committee on Education and the Workforce Ranking Member George Miller (D-CA) responded, "While parties in both Houses working together is the tried and true way to accomplish education reform, House Republicans have now opted to walk away from bipartisanship and craft partisan legislation. By abandoning efforts to reach a consensus, this partisanship shuts the door on NCLB reform in this Congress. And the end of the rewrite of this law means our nation’s children will be stuck under an outdated law for the foreseeable future."

More information

"Kline Releases Draft Accountability, Teacher Effectiveness Legislation"
House Committee on Education and the Workforce

"House GOP NCLB Proposal Would Scale Back Federal Role"
Politics K-12
Education Week

"Ten Years Later, A Better Way Forward for K-12 Schools"
House Committee on Education and the Workforce

"Miller Statement on 10th Anniversary of No Child Left Behind Act"
House Committee on Education and the Workforce Democrats

 

FY2012 Funding Omnibus Includes Previously Endangered Ed. Programs

January 16, 2011—On December 23, 2011, President Obama signed the FY 2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2012, which will fund the federal government through Sept. 30, 2012.

"After weeks of tough negotiations with our Senate counterparts--and several tenuous days this past week--we were able to complete a bipartisan, bicameral compromise that rolls back federal budgets, makes smart investments in programs people rely on, and implements policy changes that will bolster American business and our economy. As with any compromise, this bill isn't perfect, but it represents the kind of responsible governing that will help move our country forward," House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers (R-KY) said.

Unlike ESEA efforts, the bill was developed through bipartisan discussion, which may be one reason why it retains funding for several education programs, such as RTT, that the House initially wanted to cut.

  • Department of Education: Funded at $71.3 billion in the legislation, which is $153 million below last year’s level and $9.3 billion below the budget request.
  • Title I Grants: $14.5 billion, which is $60 million above FY 2011.
  • Pell Grants: The maximum Pell grant award is continued at $5,550 ($4,860 is provided through discretionary appropriations and $690 is provided through mandatory funds).
  • Special Education: Funded at $11.6 billion in the legislation – an increase of $100 million above last year’s level.
  • Race to the Top: Down from $698 million to $550 million.
  • School Improvement Grants: Level funded at $535 million
  • Investing in Innovation Fund: Level at $150 million

One of the biggest surprises was the inclusion of the Striving Readers program, which received $160 million. The program was defunded in 2011. Funding was eliminated, however, for both Teaching American History grants and the Foreign Language Assistance program. The Education and Science Partnerships program was cut to $150 million.

View the most recent budget tables from the Department of Education.

More information

"Chairman Rogers Applauds House Approval of Final Fiscal Year 2012 Appropriations Legislation"
House Committee on Appropriations

"Summary: Fiscal Year 2012 Final Consolidated Appropriations Bill"
House Committee on Appropriations

"Education Funding Details Emerge in 2012 Omnibus Bill"
Ed Money Watch
New America Foundation

"Budget Bill: Tiny Increase for Title I, Obama Ed. Programs Survive"
Politics K-12
Education Week

"Literacy Wins, History Loses in Federal Budget"
Politics K-12
Education Week

 

Evolving Policies in Texas Reflect "New Normal"

Dec. 14, 2011—At the 2011 CEO Roundtable, Game Changers, Jay Diskey, Executive Director of AAP, School Division, said that members of the education community should stop asking when things will get back to normal for school budgets and instructional materials purchases. Evolving policies at the state level, due to economics, Common Core Standards, and the rise of technology, mean that we will continue to see more funding flexibility and choices when buying learning resources and technology. Using Texas as one example of the evolution in school buying processes, Diskey advised the attendees to get used to the "new normal."

Highlights

  • There are three main reasons for the changes in the Texas buying process: 1. Districts needed more money for technology 2. Legislators were tired of the battles over textbook adoptions 3. The Commissioner wanted more say in the process.
  • Now, thanks to SB6, there is a new allotment system, which gives each district a set amount of money to spend on materials (either adopted materials or selections from the commissioner's list), technology, and tech services (including salaries).
  • While districts must certify that each student receives materials in all subjects, it is not necessarily 1-1.
  • Ordering in Texas is down 40% this year; in some subjects only one-third of the materials have been ordered. This is because many districts are having meetings to determine what to buy.

Texas will probably have a new science proclamation in 2012, but publishers are asking, why should they invest in Texas?

Listen to Diskey speak about the changes in Texas in more detail.

 

Texas School Districts Suing Over Lack of Funding

Nov. 2, 2011—The education community has continued its focus on Texas now that several school districts have sued the State Board of Education over an "arbitrary hodge-podge of approaches" to school funding. One lawsuit, lead by Equity Center, looks at inequities brought about by a 2006 law that reduced property taxes but said that no district would get less than the amount of money they received at that time. According to the lawsuit, this has resulted in huge differences in yields for similar tax effort that gave property-wealthy districts unconstitutionally greater access to educational dollars."

Moreover, the plaintiffs say the inequity has been compounded by a change in school formulas resulting in an additional $4 billion in cuts. Superintendent Scott Elliff, Corpus Christi Independent School District, told the blog site caller.com that the range of funding in Texas for 2011 is $5,000-$12,000 per student; his district expects $5,448.

A second lawsuit, led by school finance lawyer David Thompson, is focusing more on the property tax issues and the districts' lack of control both raising taxes and how to use the revenue.

More information

"Texas Districts Sue Over School Funding System"
State EdWatch, Education Week

"Texas Facing at Least Two School Funding Lawsuits"
The Texas Tribune

"CCISD trustees approve to join more than 250 other districts in school finance lawsuit"
caller.com

The Texas Taxpayer & Student Fairness Coalition, et al vs. Robert Scott, Commissioner of Education, et al
District Court of Travis County, D-1-GN-11-00313

 

Senate ESEA Bill Receives Pushback from Education Organizations

Oct. 20, 2011—On Oct. 17 Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Mike Enzi (R-WY), the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, agreed to move ahead with a bipartisan effort to reauthorize ESEA. Enzi pointed out in a statement that while there are still details that they disagree on (such as the extent of local control), he does not think the Department of Education's NCLB Waivers are the way to correct the law, and he believes the Senate can comprise and present a strong bill to the House and the President. However, a group of five education organizations believes that the Senate is moving too quickly to counteract the waivers and, in the process, might be including unreasonable provisions.

Key Objections

Teacher and Principal Evaluations: They are concerned about the "capacity of states and local school districts to develop meaningful evaluation systems that do not become mechanisms for forced teacher and principal distribution."

Growth Models and Multiple Measures: "...states will need more flexibility to design and implement robust multiple measures of student achievement."

Assessments: "...the proposed law, while opening a conversation around growth measures, is still heavily reliant on the idea of testing every child, every year through one single high-stakes summative assessment."

Turnaround Models: "the models are still highly prescriptive and four of the six are overly reliant on forced firing of teachers and principals."

In the meantime, Education Week reports that the legislation has passed the HELP Committee; Senator Harkin would like to put get the legislation to the Senate floor before Thanksgiving.

More information

"Harkin, Enzi Announce Bipartisan Support for Moving Forward with Education Reform Bill"
Senate HELP Committee

"Enzi: ESEA Bill Represents Good Starting Point in Legislative Process"
Senate HELP Committee

"Key Ed. Groups to Harkin: Let's Slow Down on ESEA"
Politics K-12, Education Week

Letter to Senators Harkin and Enzi (Oct. 16, 2011)
AASA

"Senate Education Panel Approves ESEA Rewrite Bill"
Politics K-12, Education Week

 

 

AEP

© 2011 The Association of Educational Publishers
300 Martin Luther King Blvd., Ste. 200 • Wilmington, DE 19801
P: 302-295-8350 • F: 302-778-1110 • Email: mail@AEPweb.org
 
Satellite Offices:
Two Bala Plaza, Suite 300 • Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
C/O Knowledge Alliance • 1 St Matthews Court NW • Washington, DC 20036