|
Archives AEP
Activites, Testimony, and Position Papers News
Articles Literacy Postal Rates
Children's Online Privacy Classroom
Publishers Alliance Technology Initiatives
View
the current Government Relations Committee Members |
Children’s
Online Privacy - The Children's Listbroker Privacy
Act, 3/04
- CIPA on Trial, 4/02
- Privacy
is Back in the House, 2/01
- Kids Privacy &
Education Funding Legislation, 10/00
- School Marketing
Censure Measure Fails, 4/00
- Dodd Withdraws School
Privacy Amendment † for Now, 3/00
- COPPA:
Articles on Children's Online Privacy Protection Law
–
COPPA: Let It Slide, 4/23/02 – The
FTC Hears More from AEP, 2/6/01 – Privacy Compliance:
Web Site 'Seals of Approval', 9/00 – The FTC
Follows Up/Privacy Goes to School, 8/15/00 – Kids'
Privacy News: Some Good, Some Unclear, 2/8/00 – How to Work COPPA'S
?Sliding Scale?, 2/00 – FTC Issues Children's Online
Privacy Act Final Rule, 10/99 – AEP (formerly
known as EdPress) Testifies Before FTC, 6/99 - Articles
on Internet Filtering Laws
- 'Dot Kids' Domain
Name Legislation Approved by House
AEP – your voice
in government relations. Contact
us if you
have any questions or comments. | |
•
Obama Chooses Arne Duncan to be Secretary of Education [more] •
Fiscal Survey of the States Shows Depth of Budget Crisis [more] •
U.S.
Department of Education Releases Changes to IDEA Rules
[more] •
CCSSO Releases NCLB Report; MDRC and SRI International Announce Forthcoming RFP
for RtI
[more] |
|
How
to Work COPPA'S 'Sliding Scale'February 2000 ? And now, the good news.
The FTC's final rule on COPPA does introduce some welcome flexibility: Not all
online communication is considered "collection" of information. Following
are some relevant highlights culled from the Center for Democracy and Technology's
analysis of the requirements. A child can send an e-mail requesting information,
and a Web site can respond, without triggering the parental consent requirement
? as long as the site then deletes the child's e-mail address, and doesn't use
it for other purposes. If a child so requests, a site can send multiple e-mails,
such as a newsletter; but the site must try to contact a parent, who can then
refuse future contacts with the child. Child- oriented Web sites that offer "chat"
don't need parental permission if they strip off personal information before posting.
(General-audience sites that ask the user's age, and can discern when their visitor
is a child, must obey the same consent rules.) Chat sites also can post
kids' communiqu?s as is, if they get parental consent via a secure method such
as fax-back, postal mail, phone, credit card authorization, or digital signature.
This relates to the "sliding scale" approach the FTC has adopted generally.
If a site will use the information it retains only internally, it may employ e-mail
with additional steps to assure it's a parent who's consenting. If it will disclose
the information to outside parties, or allow for posting that doesn't strip off
personal information, then it must use one of the more stringent methods for permission.
http://www.cdt.org/privacy/cdtanalysisofftc.shtml |