The Association of Educational Publishers
HomeCall to ActionNo Child Left BehindLegislative Quick HitsClassroom Publishers AllianceGovernment ResourcesArchivesLinksAEP Home

Archives

 
Archives

 

Find Your Congressman & Senators

View the current Government Relations Committee Members

News Archives

 

AEP – your voice in government relations. Contact us if you have any questions or comments.

 

Obama Administration Responds to Criticism of its Education Reform Programs [more]

Capitol Hill Update: Common Core Standards, Online Learning Registry, and Federal Funding [more]

Race to the Top Assessment Grant Features Two Contenders [more]

Report from the Hill: ESEA Reauthorization [more]

Report: AEP Gov. Relations Activity for 2009-10 Membership Year [more]

Common Core Standards Released [more]


 

 

 

Final Title I School Improvement Grants Requirements Released

Dec. 11, 2009—The Department of Education has released the final regulations and the application for the Title I School Improvement Grants. These grants will focus on turning around the lowest performing schools. States must identify three tiers of schools:

  • Tier I - The lowest-achieving five percent of Title I schools
  • Tier II - Equally low-achieving secondary schools that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I funds
  • Tier III - The remaining Title I schools in improvement, corrective action, or restructuring that are not Tier I schools in the state

Districts must then choose from one of four models to improve the school: Turnaround, Model, School Closure, and Transformational. AEP submitted comments asking the Dept. of Ed. to define "comprehensive instructional reform" to mean "improved instructional programs of one or more locally determined and coordinated interventions and resources as needed to provide enrichment for students."

Although AEP's comment was not addressed directly, the final requirements note, "The Secretary agrees that there are any number of important activities that would be appropriate to address in a transformation model. As described in this notice, the transformation model, by necessity, focuses on several broad strategies. However, nothing precludes local school leaders from expanding the model as necessary to address other factors needed to respond to the specific needs of students in the school."

In other words, it appears that the Dept. of Education is giving schools latitude in selecting what reforms are necessary. Moreover, several times in the revised guidelines, the Dept. refused to list all permissible activities, noting that those lists could not be exhaustive. For example, one commenter asked the Dept. to name technology-based solutions to the list of permissible activities. While the Dept. was willing to add the phrase "technology-based solutions," it declined to mention every permutation of those solutions.

The revised requirements state, "Although online instructional programs might be part of a school's system of technology-based supports, we decline to mention it specifically…We cannot mention in this notice, however, each and every type of instructional program."

Finally, as with Race to the Top, one commenter asked the Dept. to use the term "evidence-based" instead of "research-based." The Dept. declined to make that change, again stating, "We do not believe a change is necessary, however, because we do not use the term 'scientifically based research' and, therefore, do not invoke the stringent requirements in section 9101(37) of the ESEA."

Read the Final Notice and Application.

 

 

AEP

© 2010 The Association of Educational Publishers
300 Martin Luther King Blvd., Ste. 200 • Wilmington, DE 19801
P: 302-295-8350 • F: 302-778-1110 • Email: mail@AEPweb.org
 
Satellite Offices:
Two Bala Plaza, Suite 300 • Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
C/O Knowledge Alliance • 1 St Matthews Court NW • Washington, DC 20036