The Association of Educational Publishers
HomeCall to ActionNo Child Left BehindLegislative Quick HitsClassroom Publishers AllianceGovernment ResourcesArchivesLinksAEP Home

Archives

 
Archives

 

Find Your Congressman & Senators

View the current Government Relations Committee Members

News Archives

 

AEP – your voice in government relations. Contact us if you have any questions or comments.

 

House Releases Draft Education Bills [more]

FY2012 Funding Omnibus Includes Previously Endangered Ed. Programs [more]

Evolving Policies in Texas Reflect "New Normal" [more]

Texas School Districts Suing Over Lack of Funding [more]

Senate ESEA Bill Receives Pushback from Education Organizations [more]


 

 

 

Title I School Improvement Grants Offer Another Funding Source for Low-Performing Schools

Secretary Duncan Opens Comment Period on Proposed Requirements

August 28, 2009—On the heels of previewing the Investing in Innovation Fund, Secretary Duncan has announced the draft requirements for the Title I School Improvement Grants. With over $3.5 billion from 2009 appropriations and ARRA funding, the grants offer state education agencies another resource for helping turnaround the lowest performing schools. States must identify three tiers of schools:

  • Tier I - The lowest-achieving five percent of Title I schools
     
  • Tier II – Equally low-achieving secondary schools that are eligible for, but do not receive, Title I funds.
     
  • Tier III – The remaining Title I schools in improvement, corrective action or restructuring that are not Tier I schools in the state

Districts must then choose from one of four models to improve the school.

  • Turnaround Model – This would include among other actions, replacing the principal and at least 50 percent of the school's staff, adopting a new governance structure and implementing a new or revised instructional program.
     
  • Restart Model – School districts would close failing schools and reopen them under the management of a charter school operator, a charter management organization or an educational management organization selected through a rigorous review process. A restart school would be required to admit, within the grades it serves, any former student who wishes to attend.
     
  • School Closure – The district would close a failing school and enroll the students who attended that school in other high-achieving schools in the district.
     
  • Transformational Model – Districts would address four specific areas: 1) developing teacher and school leader effectiveness, which includes replacing the principal who led the school prior to commencement of the transformational model, 2) implementing comprehensive instructional reform strategies, 3) extending learning and teacher planning time and creating community-oriented schools, and 4) providing operating flexibility and sustained support.

Similar to the Investing in Innovation Fund, sustainability is a key element to this grant program. According to the official press release, "The secretary proposes to require that states allocate to each district the maximum per-school amount permitted under ESEA for each Tier I school where one of the four interventions is approved for implementation. The secretary also would waive the period of availability of school improvement grants beyond Sept. 30, 2011, to make funds available to school districts for three years."

Comments on the proposed requirements are due by September 25, 2009.

Department of Education Press Release

Title I School Improvement Grants Fact Sheet

Example Success Stories

Federal Register Notice of Proposed School Improvement Grants Requirements

 

 

AEP

© 2011 The Association of Educational Publishers
300 Martin Luther King Blvd., Ste. 200 • Wilmington, DE 19801
P: 302-295-8350 • F: 302-778-1110 • Email: mail@AEPweb.org
 
Satellite Offices:
Two Bala Plaza, Suite 300 • Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
C/O Knowledge Alliance • 1 St Matthews Court NW • Washington, DC 20036