The Association of Educational Publishers
HomeCall to ActionNo Child Left BehindLegislative Quick HitsClassroom Publishers AllianceGovernment ResourcesArchivesLinksAEP Home

Archives

 
Archives
AEP Activites, Testimony, and Position Papers
News Articles
Literacy Postal Rates
Children's Online Privacy
Classroom Publishers Alliance
Technology Initiatives

 

View the current Government Relations Committee Members

 

• Congress Debating New Economic Recovery Package [more]

• Regulations for Schools Increase While Funding Remains Mostly Level [more]

• Settlement Between AAP, The Authors Guild, and Google Reinforces Strength of Copyright Laws in the Digital Age [more]

• Support Fading for NCLB But Not the Principles Behind It [more]

 

 

No Child Left Behind

The issue: The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 has several provisions that contain the phrase “scientifically-based research” in reference to classroom materials. Neither a clear definition nor the scope of the requirement were given.

Our position: While AEP understood that the government was moving towards a new standard for educational materials, we felt that our members needed clarification in order for them to comply with the intent of the law.

Specifically:

  • First, does “scientifically based research,” at any level, apply to supplemental materials?
  • If so, is secondary research adequate? (Secondary research means finding existing published research that matches the educational foundations of one’s product and using that as a justification to meet the requirement.)
  • If primary level research is required, what are the criteria? Will there be any requirements by the Department of Education for school district participation, so that publishers will have access to reliable user groups for the studies? Are there any provisions in the Act to assist publishers with funding the research process?
  • Several of our companies’ products reflect core pieces of the curriculum, such as spelling—a curricular area researched with thousands of students over 100 years. Must they conduct new tests to show students need to learn lists of words and subsequently be tested on them?
  • How will the research requirements affect materials for English Language learners?
  • If a company uses outside materials in its lesson, does it need to test those too?

Actions Taken:

Outcome: The government is moving towards the gold standard requirement for research, but it understands that in many subject areas, it will take a while to get there. In the meantime, secondary research is acceptable. Publishers need to have someone on their team who really understands the literature on instructional design. Showing alignment with good instructional design principles is a strong form of secondary evidence for academic areas in which no pool of SBR currently exists.

 

 

AEP

©2008 The Association of Educational Publishers
510 Heron Drive, Suite 201 • Logan Township, NJ 08085 • P:856-241-7772 • F:856-241-0709 • Email: mail@AEPweb.org
 
Satellite Offices:
Two Bala Plaza, Suite 300 • Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
C/O Knowledge Alliance • 815 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 220 • Washington, DC 20006